I wanted to do a little comparison of 2 weeks vs. 13 weeks, to see how things have come and view them side-by-side. 

Left side:

d30e1e7e5afa45a89d83f2208e152e2a_r.jpgf6860db80de44d23844e2548a7ee7a06_r.jpg

And then the right side:

4cf68a5ef1c245748397fcca48994f60_r.jpgbcba72c795a7423f9678bf1d21915f16_r.jpg

I think the left side especially has come a long way. The right side still has the similar pattern of there being hardly much hair lower down (it's there, but very light).

Anyways, interesting, isn't it? Much as this hasn't been exactly the coverage I've been aiming for, I can't deny it's really something what 3 months can do, and for anyone attempting facial hair who thinks they can't do it, the full 3 months is essential. With few exceptions, anything shorter just kind of scratches the surface.

Oh, and by the way, I've changed my thread title. For the moment, things are well past being a Van Dyke, so this seemed easier.

“For God wished women to rejoice in their locks alone growing spontaneously, as a horse in his mane; but has adorned man, like the lions, with a beard.” - St. Clement of Alexandria




Last Edited By: thelionhearted Nov 18 15 9:10 AM. Edited 2 times.